HT: Pastoral Meanderings
Divide, Distract, and Conquer
Who speaks for the Church? As is so often the case, the media loves to point to those within the pews who dissent from or disagree with the teachings of their church. Call them cafeteria Catholics or lunch line Lutherans or buffet Baptists, the issue remains that dissenters and those who disagree do not get to define what the Church believes, confesses and teaches.
The Obama administration has attempted to exploit the fact that there are Roman Catholics who do violate their church teachings and use birth control. So what? There are dieters that cheat at Weight Watchers and AA members that sneak a drink. There are speeders who violate the speed limits and yet we do not allow them to define what is law and what is not. It is a bogus argument that will certainly backfire on the administration and it is one that we need to address whenever established teaching is challenged.
Lutherans don't get to decide what Lutherans believe, confess, and teach. That was decided for us when adopted the Book of Concord as our confessional standard. Outside of the BoC, the individual resolutions of the various Lutheran bodies define where they stand -- not individuals, be they clergy or lay.
It is about time that we remember this fact and call the ad hominem arguments that appeal to dissent or those who disagree as justification for saying this is what this church or that believes, confesses, and teaches. Who speaks for the Church? Its confessors (in Rome, the Pope and his bishops), its councils (Orthodoxy), and its confessions (Lutherans). No matter what we might like to think, these are not so vague or imprecise as to justify or allow broad diversity. All three are fairly specific. We know what Rome teaches, what Constantinople teaches, and what Wittenberg teaches. Evangelicalism is a muddle and they will have to solve that but for the rest of us, we know who speaks for the Church. Period.
No comments:
Post a Comment